Thread: Balk plus Ball
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 11, 2010, 08:01am
SanDiegoSteve SanDiegoSteve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
That just rephrases the mistake of apparently conjoining the penalties.
How? It separates them just fine. If no runners...If runners. Nothing confusing about my wording. The current wording does not make a ball call conditional upon having no runners.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Better: If no runners are on base it's an automatic ball; with runners on base it is a balk.
Why? Because you wrote it? It just restates exactly what I wrote.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Shall we turn this into a "let's rewrite OBR" thread?
Why not? Then we can put an end to asinine threads like this one.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25

Last edited by SanDiegoSteve; Fri Jun 11, 2010 at 08:03am.
Reply With Quote