Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives
The why did you say:
I don't think the intent of the rule was to disallow OTHER runs... just that no run would score BY THE APPEALED RUNNER.
Which implies that the scoring is only affected on the appealed runner.
|
R1 is not a trailing runner. R1 is ahead of everyone else. R1 started on third. R2, starting on second, was where the appeal was. I don't believe (despite the words they used being nearly identical to B) that the intent of C was to disallow R1's run because of an appeal on R2.
Not sure why this isn't clear.