Quote:
Originally Posted by Judtech
If the third defender was just playing post defense behind, then what you described would probably be a player control. Since you stated the defender was behind and trying to get the ball, that changes the play.
|
Why would the defender playing behind the player with the ball change the play in any way?
There is no difference rules-wise whether the defender plays behind, at the side or in front of a player with the ball. In all positions the defender can assume a legal, vertical stance as close as possible to the player with the ball. But no matter how close the defender gets, he still has to allow the player with the ball to make a
legal pivot. If contact occurs with the elbow while the player with the ball is making a
legal pivot, then the defender did
not attain the legal, vertical stance needed by rule.
From Hornet's description, the player with the ball made a legal pivot as per the rule already cited.
Iow, there's nowayinhell it's
probably player control just because the defender was
behind the player with the ball. You have to judge each individual play by the action of that play solely.
And don't tell me you were taken out of context again either. That boat won't float.