Quote:
Originally Posted by Judtech
If a player screens for the ball and does a 'revolving door' pivot and rolls to the basket I would be inclined to not call a foul. To me the key is what the screener is doing. IF the screener rolls straight to the basket, this, IMO, is a basketball play and any contact would be incidental. If they are 'faking' a roll to the basket and the contact is obstructing the defender then I would be inclined to put a whistle on it.
|
If you never said that any contact
after the screen between the cutter and the defensive player was
always incidental, then somebody must have hacked in and used your name to make the post above.
If a player screens for the ball and does a 'revolving door pivot' and rolls to the basket, that player is now governed by NFHS rule 4-23.
ANY contact is now decided by R4-23 and you could have a block, a charge or a no-call for incidental contact as I previously writ. What you can
NEVER have by rule is contact that is
ALWAYS incidental, as you are trying to assert above.
Your statement above is false, erroneous, misleading and completely wrong. And that's exactly what BktBallRef was trying to point out to you also.
A little clearer...and more helpful now?
