Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
While the rule book does not contain the term "illegal screen," a screen is either legal or illegal, just as a dribble is either legal or illegal or touching the ball is legal or illegal. An illegal screen is any screen that doesn't meet the definition of a legal screen.
|
I think some of you are misunderstanding my point. I'm not saying you can't commit a foul while intending to screen. (Of course you can.) I'm saying that, as soon as an intended screener causes contact, it's not a screen anymore. At that instant, it becomes something else other than a screen.
Take another look at 4-40-1, BBR. A screen is always defined a "legal action." Dribbling can be illegal. Touching can be illegal. Screening cannot.
In the three examples you provide, BBR, the intended screener caused the contact. Yes, these are fouls and undoubtedly should be called, but they're not screens anymore, because the caused contact no longer meets the definition of screen. If anything, it's an illegal attempted screen.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Did you even bother to read all of NFHS rule 4-40? If so, you sureasheck didn't understand what you read.
|
I understand it fine, JR. Rule 4-40 clearly spells out when intended screeners and screenees can and can't do. I don't see where any of that trumps the fact that, as soon as the intended screener causes contact, the definition of the screen is lost. This isn't about what contact is and isn't legal; this is about the venecular we apply to these situations.