Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
Everything else you said was right... but how can you know that there was no interference... he still hasn't described the play. I agree that it's kind of likely that there was none... which is why I asked what I did. But we surely don't know that yet.
|
mbcrowder,
I didn't say there was no interference, I said that it wasn't batter interference.
I know that because the batter had become a runner on ball 4 and rule 6.06(c) doesn't apply anymore.
JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
|