View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 31, 2010, 08:17pm
asdf asdf is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 751
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
In my experience, what follows this expression is some umpire's idea of how to resolve a situation when he doesn't know the rules.

Your post is consistent with my experience.
My experience tells me that this is an intentional act that circumvents the intent of the rules by creating an unfair advantage to one team.

I don't need this printed in black and white to understand this.

No protest board worth their salt would uphold this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
No reason to kill the ball.
While killing the ball may prevent a ball being subsequently thrown out of play and basees being awarded, it also prevents the double or triple play previously mentioned.

Instead of sending runners back or taking runs/outs off the board, you take control this situation before anything else goofy can take ocurr.
Reply With Quote