Quote:
Originally Posted by tref
Early in the 1st Q B1 is guarding the dribbler, A1 in the b/c. B1 grabs A1s arm in an attempt to steal the ball... FOUL.
Same sitch but its late in the game & Team B is trailing by 6... FOUL.
---------------------------------------------------
Early in the 1st Q B1 is guarding the dribbler, A1 in the b/c. B1 grabs A1s arm... Intentional Foul.
Same sitch but its late in the game & Team B is trailing by 6... Intentional Foul.
Whats the problem? And how is that disrespecting what the Feds want?
|
No problem. As long as the play-calling is consistent, that's exactly how the FED wants it called.
However, unless I'm reading them completely wrong, that is
not what some other posters are saying in this thread. They are advocating calling a foul on the first
contact in a late game, have-to-foul situation. That ignores the fact that the first contact may not be a foul. You might have let the exact same contact go in the first quarter because a dribbler played through it, etc, and no disadvantage was imposed by the
incidental contact. If so, you should also be letting the same contact go without a foul being called in the late-game situation also.
Do you call a defender for a foul at anytime during the game if that defender just reaches out and touches a dribbler and then immediately removes the hand? If not, and I sureashell hope not (
), you shouldn't be calling the same l'il touch a foul at the end of a game just because the defense wants to stop the clock.