|
Walter,
That's really no any different than the play that JB described. You just went into a little more detail. I would call it the same way you did.
PDL,
I'm curious. Why was this foul NOT considered Player Control? If the shooter was airborne he was obviously still involved in continuous motion. Did the official decide it wasn't PC just because he determinded it to be Intentional?
It can't be a PC foul and an intentional foul. It has to be one or the other. A A PC foul is a common foul, a intentional foul is not.
TH
[Edited by BktBallRef on Oct 30th, 2000 at 03:56 PM]
|