View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 20, 2010, 06:44am
bob jenkins bob jenkins is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Actually no one has answered the question that I am asking, because I am not asking the question only based on the rule, but the intent of the rule. And it is not being defensive to feel that there is a hole in the wording.
Could you please restate the question, because I think it's been (correctly) answered.



Quote:
We will just have to disagree on this. Case play 3.3.1T says to restrict the coaching staff to the dugout for an issue that is not related to an assistant coach arguing a judgment call.
No, it doesn't. It says to eject (not restrict) the offender (not the coaching staff).
Reply With Quote