Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
Before we throw our unnamed colleague under the bus, let's just agree:
3. that it's more likely that in the OP there was a bad throw than that the offense was secretly conspiring to maneuver their chest-bump into the throwing lane.
|
To conclude that, you'd have to assume the poster was lying through his teeth.
Plus, the explanation from the ump for not calling INT was "he just scored." Totally irrelevant and wrong.
Let's agree on something else: that the original poster was telling the truth, and that the ODH got hit by the throw in fair territory, in front of the plate, and that the throw was on the money to retire a runner attempting to score.
Now what do you have?