|
I think it was a close one. I think it was ruled that McCann hit the bat, not the bat hit him.
If that is it, it sounds like "weak INT" doesn't apply since the interpretation seems to say the bat has to hit the catcher which doesn't appear to be the case.
__________________
Question everything until you get an irrefutable or understandable answer...Don't settle for "That's Just the Way it is"
|