View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 10, 2010, 10:29am
ozzy6900 ozzy6900 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
I disagree with weak interference. The bat did not strike the catcher, the catcher moved into the bat, so there is no interference. It is a "no call".

This link takes you right to the video
ATL/SF Weak Interference or No Call?
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy

Last edited by ozzy6900; Sat Apr 10, 2010 at 10:45am.
Reply With Quote