Quote:
Originally Posted by grunewar
Just like an official, he gets one wrong ever now and again too.
|
Getting one wrong because he saw something different than the rest of us is excusable. Expressing misinformation, especially in his role, is not.
Had Kellogg said, "I believe Scheyer tried to get legal guarding position after the shooter had left the floor," then fine. I don't agree with that, but at least there's a fact (rule) behind the opinion. When someone passes on a rationale with no rules basis ("jumping into the path"), it only adds to the rule myths we have to battle.