View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 06, 2010, 10:37pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve View Post
You are missing the point, which is the focus on the pitching lane violations (the 24"-25.25" lane).
No, I didn't miss it. I understand, just don't think that should be THE priority.

Quote:
Of course, the umpire on the line has better looks at the feet relative to the PP; I personally subscribe to the theory that leaps and crow hops can be seen from anywhere in the infield, and should be called when they happen, irrespective of BU position.
No argument there.

Quote:
We laughed at our "stars" never (or rarely) being called for what everyone can see; and we know the umpires knew they wouldn't be supported if they called it. The current atmosphere finally supported it; the pendulum swung too far, too fast, for some, and a correction has been implemented. But, at least the pendulum has swung to support those willing to call the more obvious IP's, and the pressure is more on those who won't, than those who will. I find that refreshing.
As posted before, no one is claiming the called pitches are not illegal, but that the umpires actually have the nerve to call THEIR pitcher illegal. But we all know those coaches are very much aware of their pitcher's mechanics and tendencies, legal or not.

I just hope there is no pushback after the season that will negate the strides made in making the appropriate calls.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote