View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 24, 2010, 07:26am
Skarecrow Skarecrow is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Layton, Utah
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72 View Post
Well, in the original play, the batter is not a batter anymore when he strikes out (nor a runner since he is not entitled to run). He is then considered another teammate, so the "batter's" interference rule would not apply.
Disagree. He is a batter at the start of the play, same as any other batter who interferes. The ball hitting the catcher's glove doesn't change batter's role after the pitch is delivered. He is still the batter for interpreting BI.
__________________
I love to mate.....Chess, The Kings Game
Reply With Quote