Sun Mar 21, 2010, 06:08pm
|
|
Stop staring at me swan.
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TussAgee11
It absolutely did JM. I have written in my book "if first throw retires runner, ignore INT" next to 6.06c. The comment there "if, however, the catcher makes a play and the runner attempting to advance is put out, it is to be assumed there was no actual interference and that runner is out -- not the batter."
I know it wasn't the play the catcher originally wanted to make, but it was indeed a play. I realize its not the clearest ruling, but I don't see in here where there is justification to kill it, get the batter, and send them back.
FED, different story of course.
|
What would be the mechanic for the OP in FED? These situations get tough for me during our season when working multiple rule sets in the same season sometimes two different rule sets in two days...IMO, this is one that should be the same between FED/OBR
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
|