View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 28, 2000, 12:13pm
papa bear papa bear is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 3
although i sort of agree with the rule. i dont agree that the offense has an unfair advantage, after all it was their defense who created the situation. it absolutely should be 1st and 25. too many late blatant hits on fourth down and i can see why. why not? take out their star back or backs, you get the ball and it's first and ten. 1st and 25 is a big deal, 1st and ten means nothing.with this rule it seems that the defense gets a license to intentionally try and hurt certain offensive players on 4th downs.
Reply With Quote