Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvin green
The story seems wierd but...
ART. 7 . . . A player who is bleeding, has an open wound, has any amount of
blood on his/her uniform, or has blood on his/her person, shall be directed to
leave the game until the bleeding is stopped, the wound is covered, the uniform
and/or body is appropriately cleaned, and/or the uniform is changed before
returning to competition, unless a time-out is requested by, and granted to,
his/her team and the situation can be corrected by the end of the time-out.
the player is replaced or they take a time out and get it fixed.... there is no putting the ball in play with 4, there is no having the coach delay...
|
So if he won't replace the player do you charge that team with a timeout first or do you have the timer start the 20-second replacement interval and make them sub at the risk of a T?
I agree that the story is weird and the 4 on 5 never should have happened in the first place. There could be more to the story, but I've
heard several accounts of it and they're all pretty consistent with what I posted in the OP.
Anyone else have anything??