Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
And has it been definitively stated by anyone in authority that this law would ever apply in this situation?
|
Yes, as I mentioned previously, every level of Oregon court. Not necessarily binding in other states but certainly an authoritative body.
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
Reasonably accommodated. One of the mothers of all broad terms. And is missing a consolation game undue hardship?
|
The hardship it is talking about is not the hardship of missing something due to the lack of an accomodation but the effect on others. It wouldn't be reasonable for ask the others for a change that would cause substantially more expense (extra night's hotel, additional travel, etc. or requiring the tournament host to extend to event additional days) but swapping times of two games between 3pm to 7pm, for example, likely has no material impact on anyone. It is a neutral swap. I can't see why there is even any resistance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
To ask to change the schedule of a tournament, which was made probably a year in advance, to accommodate any one group for any reason sounds like a lot to ask to me.
|
I just don't see that is much of anything to ask at all. Most these tournaments have several games per day and all it amounts to is swapping times with another pair of teams.
It is nothing new that religious schools have limits in what they can do based on thier beliefs. The state organizations are usually chartered to server ALL schools. Even if the schedule was made in advance, they knew they had such a school...if not, they know for the next year. They should plan for the possibility...its not that hard. It sounds more like someone just don't want to spend the 5 extra minutes to think about how to accomodate them.