View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 22, 2010, 07:26am
bigjohn bigjohn is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
show me that definition.

The defense was deceived! It doesn't say anyone intended to!



Then it is always be IP, 9-6-4 d doesn't say the deception must be intentional!

A has used a player, in a substitute situation, immediately before the snap and it deceived the defense.

From 3.7.5
Furthermore, the act
of his coming onto the field must not deceive the defensive team.

It doesn't say intent, it just says act!!!!!!!!!!



The fact that the QB threw him a quick pass is all the proof any officials should need to prove it was done to deceive!

Last edited by bigjohn; Mon Feb 22, 2010 at 09:33am.
Reply With Quote