Quote:
Originally posted by JMN
Andrew,
I reread it and it does say "such motion" which I guess refers back to the previous mention in the sentence. Right?
If so, then a back could position himself 20 yards behind the LOS and begin motion towards B's goal line. As long as he didn't appear to be false starting and if he turned and ran parallel with the line (say 5 yards behind his LOS) at the time of the snap, this would be legal?
Sounds weird to me.
I guess the question on the rule is whether the "such motion" clause refers to "at the time of snap" or anytime during his motion. My take would be anytime he is in motion he can't run towards B's goal line. That's the way I understand it.
Anyone else care to clarify?
|
Here is the rule
"Only one A player may be in motion at the snap and then only if
such motion is not toward his opponent's goal line. . . ."
By definition, the word "such" has to refer to a specific situation and the only situation specifally mentioned in the sentence is motion at the snap.
I would hope that if the NF were trying to say that motion isn't allowed to be forward, that they would come directly out and say it. Something like:
Motion
1. Only one A player may be in motion at the snap.
2. A player in motion may not move toward his opponents goal line.
I think you agree that "such" has to refer to something specific.
As added support (although admittedly a little weak), when does motion become a foul? Simultaneous with the snap, right? The snap is what makes motion forward illegal.
The play as your described it would be legal (as far as I can tell).
I'm open to hear anyone else interpretation of this as well. Around my area, I don't see teams using motion toward the line of scrimmage.
Thanks!
[Edited by mikesears on Jan 3rd, 2003 at 07:41 AM]