yeah, I had to reread that OP. I thought my follow up made it clear that I misread it at first. even the quotes shows I had misread it, and I followed it up without changing the first part of my reply showing I misread it. should I explain one more time how it was misread?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
Steve's point was that you were wrongly saying the BR is out due to the runner breaking up a double play. The runner who committed the interference was already retired at the time of the interference, therefore the referece you cited does not apply.
|