Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
The problem is that OBR contains two contrary statements. One is 6.05(j):
"A batter is out when...After a third strike or after he hits a fair ball, [the batter] or first base is tagged before he touches first base."
By this test, the ball must beat the runner, so a "tie" would go to the runner.
The other is 7.01 (already quoted by dash, above)
"7.01 A runner acquires the right to an unoccupied base when he touches it before he is out."
By this test, the runner must beat the ball, so a "tie" would result in an out.
This is one of the 237 problems with OBR. By tradition, at every level the test implied in 7.01 is employed on the field: the runner must beat the ball.
FED rules do not contain the contraries: see 8-4-2(j).
|
I've never understood why UMPIRES really care about this. I mean, this is how it goes:
Me: He's out.
(Coach paddles out to me.)
Coach: Why is he out?
Me: Cause he is.
Coach: Wasn't it a tie?
Me: (Silence.)
Coach: Well?
Me: He's out, let's go.
...
I mean, I'm certainly not going to get into a game of him trying to trip me up. And I will continue to call every single play that's too close to be discerned by the naked eye as an out, as I have the last 20 or so years. And no, I will never get help from a partner, so don't bother asking.
Life goes on.