Sat Feb 13, 2010, 12:16pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 653
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shagpal
yes, I understand the position already laid out. the validity for doing nothing has already been established, but not the awkwardness and confusion doing nothing can cause, hence your temptation and my contention. nothing works for me for in a host of situations, but not for the panacea being hailed for this situation.
there is only one section in the umpires manual regarding appeals. it's on page 12 to 13, totaling 3 simple paragraphs. the last paragraph taken in whole and entirety does not reconcile w/ doing nothing. the key word that I find alarming being "wishes". wishes conveys desire & intention, whereas the do nothing camp is arguing validity.
I appreciate your engaging and candid response, but I am expecting for mikes (irishmafia) response, since he was most adamant.
|
shagpal,
You wouldn't happen to be a lawyer in your day job, would you?
__________________
Larry
|