Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne
But doesn't the rule just say "dangerous" and not "dangerous to others"?
This year's NFHS change will add to the confusion in other rules.  |
And that's how I adjust based on the level of play. I will make a youth player remove jewelry I judge dangerous to either her or others; she cannot legally make a conscious decision to assume liability for her stupidity to endanger herself, so I can be held liable.
With adults, I only make them remove that which is dangerous to others. They are legally responsible for their stupidity in that regard, and I would have minimal, if any liablility when they make an adult (albeit stupid) decision which affects only themselves.