Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Question about the double T decision that your partner made: Did the fouler and the teammate exchange words or pushes? Was he penalizing them for offenses committed against each other? If not, and the fouler was T'd for standing over the shooter while the teammate was T'd for coming to the shooter's aid, then this should NOT have been a double T. It should have been a false double technical foul and the two teams each should have been awarded 2FTs in the order in which the fouls occurred.
|
I respectfully beg to differ, Mr. CumquatHead.
Were the techical fouls committed by opponents? Check!!
Did the technical fouls occur at
approximately the same time? Check!!
Did the opponents
not commit the technical fouls against each other? Check!!(only one of the "T"s was against each other, not both)
Sure sounds to me like it meets the definition of a simultaneous technical foul as per rule 4-19-10.
And there is also nowayinhell it can
only be a false double technical foul. Did you forget the original personal foul on the shooter? It's a false double foul comprised of the original personal foul on the shooter followed by the simultaneous technical fouls.
And how do you administer this, you ask? There's no FT's for a simultaneous technical foul and you go to the POI as per rule 10-6PENALTIES SUMMARY 1(d). And in this case the POI is the first FT for the personal foul committed on the shooter as per rule 4-36-2(b). And you shoot the FT's with the players on the lane lines.