Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
Looks like the officials did it the right way, given what they had to work with.
|
From reading the article, I'm going to disagree, but I'll ask Bob for clarification since it was his game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
While I wasn't the R, I was on the game. The R did go over to the table before OT and had a long (but not long enough, or else too long) conversation.
|
Bob, from the article it seems that the home book had the proper number of points for the home team in regulation, namely 52. I assume that this was the official book, and thus the official score. The fact that the scoreboard and the visiting book incorrectly displayed 51 shouldn't matter, right?
So it seems that what was done during the extra period was that the scoreboard and the visiting book were changed to reflect what was already in the home/official book. If that is the case, and the official book was NOT changed at that point, then I would say that the game should have been terminated at that point. This is different from changing the official book at some point in OT, which would cause the game to continue. In your case, had I been the R, I would have declared the home team the winner in regulation and filed a report with the state association/league.
Can you clarify exactly what took place, even though you were not the R?