Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Well then okay, do as you believe best. My conscience will be clear that I have done all that I could to steer you down the proper path.
I have advised you of the rule. I have given you the NFHS description of its intent and purpose from when it was introduced. I have even given you a specific case play ruling for the given situation, which explicitly instructs the official what to call.
If you elect to handle this differently, then that's totally up to you.
|
No one would ever even THINK of blaming you, Nevada! Why is your conscience even an issue....
Ah, geez, I said I wasn't going to flame anyone, and it's only the 14th of Jan and you've already got my hair curling out like my finger's in an electrical socket...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
This is not a fair criticism because the NFHS rules are written to cover just single games, not multiple games in succession.
The local governing authority for those games would have to make a ruling as to how to handle your scenario. Something such as when the clock starts for the pre-game warm-up for the next contest or when the new teams take the floor, etc.
|
But when the local governing authority hasn't yet made a ruling...
We get to use our best judgment. Since this rule is aimed at sportsmanship and expressions of disgust or hostility, I think it's perfectly reasonable, and not even remotely pussilanimous to judge that the kid is just in a hurry to get to his job, or is simply trying to avoid the locker room problems, or doesn't know that there's a problem, and is just getting on with his life. None of those situations have anything to do with sportsmanship, and the game is over, and everyone is moving on with their lives. Why throw the bus into reverse, strip the gears, run over a couple or twenty fans, and ruin the entire evening for everyone, if the so-called problem (unsportsmanlike behavior) doesn't even exist?