Thread: Why ping-pong?
View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 13, 2010, 06:08pm
TheRugbyologist TheRugbyologist is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellnier View Post
No, I think the critical word is present tense "have" (not 'had'). This is the picture in my head...I tackle you...we both go to ground...you release the ball. I get to my feet before you, and no one has yet commited to the ruck. As I put my hands on ball which is still on the ground, the ruck forms. The Law allows me to play the ball on the ground with my hands.
But maybe not...
This is exactly the case. It is the only exception allowing handling in the ruck.

Given the official desire to streamline this phase, I would have preferred it if they had gone in the other direction and restricted handling post tackle rather than liberalized it. Rucking requires players to use their arms to bind, not handle.
Reply With Quote