Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
John Cahill just whistled a critical one against #33 of UConn right at the end of the 2nd half. Score tied at 69 and under a second left.
Upon replay the action looked awkward, but not illegal. I have to wonder how good of a look he had from his position as the Lead.
Upon checking the monitor, the crew put 0.7 on the clock and administered 2 FTs. Obviously, the decision of the foul cannot be reviewed and the crew was only looking at the clock, which I believe was handled properly given the determination that a foul occurred.
Anyone else see the end of this game? What are your thoughts on the decision?
Note: The Cinci player made both FTs and they won the game 71-69.
|
I thought the bump earlier was likely a stronger foul, but one they weren't going to call.
This is a tough call for the L. It's in his primary, but he has a tough look at the jump shot. I gotta say, the best ANGLE probably comes from the center opposite (right through the jump shooter and the defender), but he's along way away and isn't going to reach over there.
He made the call. It was a well-sold call.