Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad
I know that this is going to bring out some Rulebook Robbies that love to get caught up in the minutiae of the rules, but this is such a great example of when common sense prevails.
|
Why do a lot of posters try to to justify their OWN
opinion by saying that anybody that might happen to disagree with them is a (a) a rule book official (b) lacks common sense (c) is never going to be successful and rise past JV games if they don't do it their way (d) doesn't understand advantage/disadvantage (e) states that you have to be "fair" (f) says that it's "good game management"...or some other similar tactic to advance their own theories about why you can forget about the rulebook and mechanics manual and do it
their way instead.
Why not just say that
you feel that this is the best way to handle the situation? Or that this is the way that it is handled in your area?
I've granted timeouts by the rule book for the last 50 years and every successful official that I know of has done the same.
Iow I disagree not only with your opinion but your method of justifying your opinion.
Soooooo, which one of us is right about TO's?
Imo the one that finds out what procedure is being used in their area or by the conferences that they're working in, and then following that procedure so that there is uniformity in calling. That's what I call common sense.
Just MY Opinion.