Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
NFHS rule 2.6 states definitively that that the decision of the official that made the call will prevail unless that official decides to change their call. That doesn't make the official "correct". It just means that his/her call will stand if he/she wants it to stand.
Believe it or not, the "N' in NFHS does not stand for "Nevada".  Soooooo, that's the way it is rules-wise, whether you agree with it or not. |
JR, my point is that both officials made a call/decision, but only one blew his whistle. The other official decided that the play was perfectly legal and chose not to sound his whistle. What I am asking is why does the decision of the whistle-blower override the decision of the non-whistler. There is no logical reason for it.
Why can't I say that the call that the play is legal will stand?
If we always go with the whistle, then we are actually allowing one official to always overrule the judgment of another who chose not to blow simply by putting air into his whistle. That's not right.