View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 21, 2009, 11:07pm
TimTaylor TimTaylor is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef View Post
In Washington, the state rules state the shot clock starts when player/team control is established.
Which brings us right back to referee99's earlier post: If the shot clock operator didn't hold the reset until player/team control is gained or misjudged when that occurred (ie: touched vs. controlled) that could easily account for the three second difference. From the description, it appears that is what the trail official observed to occur, which would explain why he had the shot clock reset.

In any case, as has been pointed out by both rule and case book situation, the trail official has the sole responsibility and authority for determining the occurrence of a 10 second back court violation. This is not the job of either the timer or shot clock operator - they need to focus on their own responsibilities and let the officials take care of theirs.

There are a lot of subtle nuances in the practice and art of officiating, and it takes a lot of time and effort to learn to apply them effectively and consistently. Coaches, players, table crew and fans for the most part have no clue unless they've been there.

Rant mode off - nomex underwear on.....flame away!
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons - for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup!
Reply With Quote