Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
So, what are you saying the legal implications could be? The presence of this device is a violation of the rules. The official allowed it anyway. The device then somehow causes any injury. Now the official is somehow liable. I've still never seen a law quoted on this subject. Judge Wapner (People's Court) often used the phrase "what a reasonable person would do" or something similar. Given all the information here, I do not see it as unreasonable that the device in question was allowed to stay.
|
The disclaimer/waiver having no value and the official's liability are unrelated.
And, I'm not sure the device is illegal by rule. I'd have to see this wire to determine if I believe it's actually dangerous.