Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
Good is a relative term. The fifth foul should be good. Certainly. But good relative to what, if not the other four fouls? This implies that it is less important that the other fouls be good.
|
Okay, JAR, see if you can follow me here...
Exactly which words, which phrases in the statement "The fifth foul should be good" imply anything about the first four fouls? Yes, the word "good" is a relative term, it implies a comparison. But the implied comparison is only between a good or bad fifth foul.
The statement you are criticizing does not, in fact,
imply anything at all about the first four fouls. What you have chosen to
infer from that statement, well that's your doing.