View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 08, 2009, 01:11pm
Scratch85 Scratch85 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
The definition of POI includes AP as a last resort. There are certain situations, however, that go AP by rule rather than POI. Simultaneous FT violation, non-throwin lodged in the rim, held balls, new quarters. For some of these, it doesn't make a difference (rim lodge and Simultaneous FT violation); for others (held balls), it might.
Am I missing any situations that go AP by rule rather than POI when I say they are listed in 6-4-3(a,b,c & f) and to start 2nd, 3rd and 4th quarters?

Edited: This is a legitimate question and not intended to bait anyone. I fear I am missing a situation that ruins my whole thought process.

Last edited by Scratch85; Tue Dec 08, 2009 at 01:18pm.
Reply With Quote