Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
How did the Big 12 not follow the rule? I have seen this done several times before in other conferences.
Peace
|
I'm not sure I understand your question but I'll give you my answer. I assume just like some NF state can modify a rule or OT for example, the Big 12 modified the replay rules and from what I've read of them, it narrows the replay official's duties, taking away the latitude that 12-3-6 gives.
From the Big 12:
Miscellaneous
Article 3. Miscellaneous reviewable plays include:
a. A runner judged to have been not down by rule. (Note: If a runner is ruled down, the play is not reviewable).
b. A runner’s forward progress with respect to a first down.
c. Touching of any type kick by any player.
d. The number of players participating by either team during a live ball.
e. A scrimmage kicker beyond the line of scrimmage when the ball is kicked.
f.
Clock adjustment when a ruling on the field is reversed.
g. A fumble recovery by a Team A player during fourth down or a try and before any change of possession.
Plays Not Reviewable
Article 4. No other plays or officiating decisions are reviewable.
So does the Big 12 or any conference have the ability to write their own rules and supersede the NCAA rule?