View Single Post
  #40 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 04, 2009, 10:13am
jicecone jicecone is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
"An appeal should be clearly intended as an appeal, either by a verbal request by the player or an act that unmistakably indicates an appeal to the umpire"

Given the rulebook language quoted above and not having a copy of JR, how is the runner returning to second any different then the runner returning on a tag up or missing home plate. They are both unrelaxed actions and both appealable errors. How does JR justify this . Or am I missing something.
Reply With Quote