View Single Post
  #41 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 04, 2009, 08:48am
BroKen62 BroKen62 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by bisonlj View Post
Actually the illegal substitution foul we looked at was 3-7-6 "During a down, a replaced player or substitute who enters the field, but does not participate, constitutes illegal substitution." In the penalty section for this rule it indicates this is considered a non-player foul. We couldn't find an IP rule that fit since the players did not participate. So that left us with USC or IS non-player both of which fall under the rule you state above to NOT extend the period. What I would like to know is an official word on what rule applies when this happens.
You are absolutely correct. Please accept my apology.

The only option that would have extended the period would have been illegal participation.
Reply With Quote