Quote:
Originally Posted by bisonlj
The only explanation one can offer is the official thought the receiver would come down in-bounds without the contact.
The case book very clearly states this is to be an intepretation of the force-out rule. If the contact is in the direction the receiver is already moving, the receiver has to complete the catch with at least one foot in bounds. That was obviously not the case.
|
Correct interpretation of the force-out rule.
While I sit in a very comfortable chair watching the video several times and the official had to make the call in real-time.
However, the official does take a good wide position on the sideline and immediately moves to the goal line on the snap and as the ball arrives he straddles the sideline while watching the ball.
You have to ask, why is he watching the ball (note the bill of the cap) and not observing the opponents in his area. If a PI occurred he would not see it. At the time the receiver touches the ball he first observes contact and probably was unable to properly observe the receiver's ability or inability to come down in-bounds, and, properly apply the force-out rule.
You have to wonder how many times this official has seen this situation.