View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 30, 2009, 05:59pm
bbcof83 bbcof83 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by john_faz View Post
It also looks like the snapper is covered and then goes downfield on a pass pattern. I am not all that clear on the numbering exceptions but since he is covered that would be a 5 yard penalty and a negation of the touchdown that should nothave been called in the first place.
Correct, the snapper is covered, illegal man downfield.

It's moot but the official must have ruled that he was forced out and would have come down in bounds had it not been for the contact. With the benefit of replay I disagree but that's a tough call on the spot. Prob should err on the side of no catch though.
Reply With Quote