Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
So glasses or goggles are headwear? Horse manure.
The paragraph at the end of the ruling doesn't supersede what's written two paragraphs earlier. That paragraph clearly says that a face mask and eye protection is permissable to wear. It says nothing about state approval being required. Headwear is an item worn on top of the head, not on the face.
As BITS said, "Game, set and match to NFHS." No interest in arguing it with you when you're so obviously wrong.
|
While I was initially inclinded to say the above mentioned device was legal, I'm with Neveda on this one.
The case says that it is up to the state to approve headwear. The state is not required to approve it but without such an approval, it is not legal.
It clearly not the same as glasses nor the same as an explicitly authorized protector for a broken nose as long as it has no dangerous edges.