|
My interp is consistent with rules also. Any B violation causes a new throw in. I for one do not blindly follow NF in such blatantly wrong interpretations.
For those of you who believe the NF ruling I need you to clarify a few points.
1. There are a number of violations that B could commit before an AP throwin ends. Which ones result in a new throw in awarded to team A?
2. WHAT criteria Has the NF has provided to determine whether to award a new throw in or not?
3. What makes one violation more egregious than another that would allow team A to be awarded a new throw in in one case and not a new Throw in given another violation?
All interpretations need to be consistent by Rule.
Therefore:
ALL violations of throw in by A on AP throw in also cause loss of arrow. Award new throw in to Team B.
ALL violations of throw in by B on AP throw in also allow A to retain arrow. Award new throw in to Team A.
|