[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I think the intent is such that the dribble ends when an interrupted dribble touches an opponent. It's not in the control of the dribbler.

I'm having a difficult time reconciling your statement with "The ball touches or is touched by an opponent and causes the dribbler to lose control.". The word "causes" has some pretty definite connotations. There is the obvious cause and effect relationship, in this case between "touches" and "lose control". It also implies an order of events, first "touching" then "lose control". During and interrupted dribble, control has already been lost.