Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheelcoach
The article.
# The probability of a foul being called on the visiting team was 7 percent higher than on the home team.
# When the home team is leading, the probability of the next foul being called on them is about 6.3 percentage points higher than when the home team is trailing.
# The larger the foul differential between two teams, the greater the likelihood that the next call will be made against the team with fewer fouls. For example, when a home team has three or more fouls than the visiting team, the probability that the next foul call is made against the visiting team is more than 60 percent. When the foul differential is as high as five, then that probability rises to 69 percent. The researchers also observed this trend when they looked at neutral-court games.
VERY interesting info on the human aspect of officiating. But what can we take from this? I guess being aware of these trends can help us mitigate them, but beyond that I don't know what else to take from it.
|
Don't believe everything you read, coach. You can make numbers/statistics say anything you want. For example, many schools I go to don't even have team fouls posted. We don't even know what the foul count is. How are we expected to call a certain percentage of fouls when we don't even know there's a 3 foul differential or whatever? It's stupid.
I make calls based on what I see, not where I'm or whose winning the game.