Quote:
Originally Posted by Berkut
Rulebook aside
|
That's the problem, we can't nor should we put the rulebook aside, especially in this situation.
Quote:
We also know that there is one answer that it CANNOT be:
0.0
|
By rule, it certainly can be.
To me, it is fairly clear that the rule makers do not want the officials to guess on the amount of time to subtract from or add to the clock. While this may not be "fair", it should provide for a consistent administration.
There are numerous rules that don't seem fair in all sports, the inadvertant whistle rule in football for example is not always "fair". I think we can get into some dangerous areas when we decide which rules to set aside because they do not meet our definition of "fair".
Quote:
It bugs me that we are going to choose the one single answer we know for certain is NOT the correct amount of time left in the game,
because we cannot exactly determine which of the other answers is the correct one, but would have to rely on an estimate, because the books demands "definite" knowledge.
|
You should suggest a rule change then.
What do I tell the coach if I do not have definite knowledge? "Sorry coach, that's the rule."