View Single Post
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 17, 2009, 02:50pm
cdaref cdaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy View Post
Then please explain 4.19.8 Sit. C.
I can't explain it.

BUT I can say that it does not mandate that preliminary signals are irreversible. I think the only way to understand 4.19.8(C) is to think of the situation where both officials steadfastly insist their call is correct and there is no other way to resolve it. Otherwise it doesnt make sense.

What I refuse to do is read into an already whacky case play an even whackier new RULE: that preliminary signals now are mandatory and unchangable and there cannot be any deferring. I dont think 4.19.8(C) dictates that.
Reply With Quote