View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 15, 2009, 04:31pm
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Agree that s/he is an airborne shooter. Not sure why it matters. Since it wasn't a 2- or 3-point attempt, it's not a "shooting foul" (an undefined term -- but I mean the peanlty is not Pentaly 2 or 5 in teh Penatlies Summary),

So, it's "just" a common foul -- ball OOB or bonus FTs.
I can live with the ruling. It seems reasonable to me. I would prefer the NFHS to add a part c to number 5 in the penalty section for Rule 10 or a Case Book ruling for this situation, but even if this has to fall under 2-3 what you write makes good sense.

I guess we're back to "always listen to bob."
Reply With Quote