View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 04:50pm
FrankHtown FrankHtown is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 572
I thought, up until this case book ruling, that they clear the lane, let A shoot the second shot, then give B the ball at the point of interruption, since there was a change of possession.

Now, if the timer was on his/her toes, and didn't start the clock after the missed free throw, I could see going back and shooting the free throw with players on the lane.
Reply With Quote